Posts Tagged ‘Evolution’
Prometheus provides an alternative mythology to Genesis. And there are some references to Christian theology. Notice the Christmas tree and the Crucifix. And the Crucifix is seen again and again in the movie as a sign of faith or its loss.
Let us focus on Prometheus and Christ. Prometheus gave up his life so that the evolution of man can start. Christ, on the other hand, gave up his life to save mankind from sin, and on the side of Christ flowed the water of life and his life-giving blood. Prometheus (it need not be the same person) slept in a tomb and was resurrected from sleep by the humans. Christ was buried in a tomb and rose from the dead by his own power. Prometheus has human DNA. And so is Christ. But the similarities ends here.
Even though the whole ship is filled with runes of the ancient tongue, Prometheus can’t talk. And he refused to talk to reveal himself. He could have said, “Why did you open the Stargate?” Or “Remove the sandals from your feet because the place you are standing is holy.” The humans attempted to communicate with him, but he just killed them. That was disappointing: a god who can’t reveal himself. Just like the idols of Israel: they have mouths but do not speak. But the Christian God reveals Himself: “I AM WHO I AM”. He gave the Ten Commandments. He sends prophets who proclaim: “This is the word of the Lord!” And in the fullness of time He sent His Son, Jesus Christ, the Word Made Flesh.
God is our Father. If God is an alien, then the bond uniting the whole human family breaks down. Heaven becomes harsh inhospitable planet for the human crew that seeks to finally meet its creator. Sexual intercourse becomes sterile. The child in the womb becomes an alien that should be aborted. The only way to conceive a new life is to destroy the old one. And even in human relationships, father becomes emotionally distant from his daughter, the automaton becomes valued as a son, and compassion is dulled even in sight of a bloodied and suffering woman.
But God is a loving Father and that is what the Parable of the Prodigal Son teaches us. Jesus promised us that He will prepare a place for us in heaven. And in heaven, God awaits for the homecoming of his beloved sons and daughters. And when He sees us from a distance, He will run towards us, and embraces us as His long lost children. He will give us robes to wear, put rings in our fingers, put sandals on our feet, and announce a feast. As Jesus promised, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents. A society built on the vision of God as a Father results to families and communities bound by love. The swords will be beat into plowshares. The lion will lie down with a lamb. And death would lose its sting: it would be true immortality when the soul reunites with the body in the Resurrection of the Dead.
Prometheus is a bleak movie for Atheistic Materialism and Scientific Darwinism. Is Prometheus the God atheists and Darwinists longed for? David, the android, says it best:
David: Why do you think your people made me.
Charlie Holloway: We made ya ’cause we could.
David: Can you imagine how disappointing it would be for you to hear the same thing from your creator?
Like David, humanity without God will be humans without souls. And even if humans attain eternal life, it would be one long and dreary life of a disembodied head watching the sands and stars.
The encylical Humani Generis of Pope Pius XII discussed the various errors propagated in ecclesiastical institutions by teachers using historical and natural (evolution) sciences in their exegesis. I will extract his words regarding evolution and evolutionism:
Humani Generis on Evolution
5. Some imprudently and indiscreetly hold that evolution, which has not been fully proved even in the domain of natural sciences, explains the origin of all things, and audaciously support the monistic and pantheistic opinion that the world is in continual evolution. Communists gladly subscribe to this opinion so that, when the souls of men have been deprived of every idea of a personal God, they may the more efficaciously defend and propagate their dialectical materialism.
6. Such fictitious tenets of evolution which repudiate all that is absolute, firm and immutable, have paved the way for the new erroneous philosophy which, rivaling idealism, immanentism and pragmatism, has assumed the name of existentialism, since it concerns itself only with existence of individual things and neglects all consideration of their immutable essences.
36. For these reasons the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter – for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God. However, this must be done in such a way that the reasons for both opinions, that is, those favorable and those unfavorable to evolution, be weighed and judged with the necessary seriousness, moderation and measure, and provided that all are prepared to submit to the judgment of the Church, to whom Christ has given the mission of interpreting authentically the Sacred Scriptures and of defending the dogmas of faith. Some however, rashly transgress this liberty of discussion, when they act as if the origin of the human body from pre-existing and living matter were already completely certain and proved by the facts which have been discovered up to now and by reasoning on those facts, and as if there were nothing in the sources of divine revelation which demands the greatest moderation and caution in this question.
37. When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which, through generation, is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.